A blog for attorneys and judges to discuss questions, raise concerns, and engage in general discussions of family law issues arising in Minnesota courts. This blog has been launched by Judge Steve Halsey, Wright County District Court, chambered in Buffalo, MN. Please read RULES & DISCLAIMER. Comments must NOT include any solicitations or links to lawyers' websites.
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
The Learned Treatise: Ever Offered One at Trial?
About 25 years ago as a lawyer I was in the midst of a custody trial when the opposing lawyer offered as evidence a scholarly article written by a University of Minnesota professor who had studied the adverse effects upon children of living with a parent with a chaotic lifestyle, ie. multiple residences and multiple partners. Since this basically described my client, we were sunk and lost the case. For years to come I reminded this attorney (we are now both judges) of how he "pulled a rabbit out of the hat" in that case. I believe that most judges would find a learned treatise very helpful in deciding custody, parenting time and other family law issues. Rule of Evidence 803 (18) provides that a learned treatise may be admitted under certain conditions, but I think the reference to being admitted through an expert witness would probably not be required by most judges given the severely-limited resources of most family court litigants. The Comments refer to the requirement that it be read into the record and not admitted as a trial exhibit as being applicable in jury trials. This should be considered as another tool when your client can't afford the services of an expert witness.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment